Keeping Up and Checking In

Read the latest news, tips, and get access to the information you need to advocate effectively for the freedom to read.

Why the Freedom to Read Is Essential for a Healthy Democracy

constitution over the flag

How Access to Diverse Viewpoints Strengthens Critical Thinking, Civic Engagement, and Resistance to Authoritarianism

A healthy democracy depends on the free flow of information, the open exchange of ideas, and citizens capable of thinking critically about the world around them. These are not abstract principles: they are lived, daily practices that begin early, often with a simple act… reading.


The Phantom Book Challenge: How Fear a Book Could Be Challenged Bans It Before It Even Reaches the Shelf

woman hushing

Soft Censorship, Manufactured Controversy, and the Perfect Storm Undermining Students’ Right to Read

Across the country, a new form of censorship is tightening its grip on public education, one far more difficult to document, track, or challenge. It doesn’t involve a parent storming into a school board meeting, a viral complaint, or a formal review process. Instead, it happens quietly, invisibly, and often with no paper trail at all.


What Students Lose When They Can’t Choose Their Own Books

children reading in library

Why Self-Selection, Intellectual Autonomy, and Identity Development Matter More Than Ever

Across the country, book bans and “approved lists” are becoming a new normal in schools. Classrooms are being stripped of diverse texts, library shelves are thinned out, and students are asked to choose from sanitized, restricted, or ideologically filtered options. What many adults don’t realize is that when students lose the ability to choose what they read, they lose far more than access to a single book. They lose academic opportunities, emotional development, and the foundations of lifelong learning.


The Phoenix Declaration: What It Is and What Floridians Can Expect Now That the State Has Become the First to Adopt It

teacher and students in classroom

When states shift educational policy, it usually comes with committee hearings, public comment, and long policy documents that parents, teachers, and community members can comb through. But every so often, a new framework enters the scene with minimal notice, cleanly packaged, seemingly harmless, and deliberately vague. That is the case with the Phoenix Declaration, a new education framework authored by the Heritage Foundation, which Florida has now become the first state in the nation to adopt.


Incorporating the Freedom to Read into Your Holiday Gift-Giving Plan

mom handing son wrapped holiday gift

The holidays are about connection, generosity, and stories, those we tell around tables, those we carry from childhood, and those we place into one another’s hands. This year, you can turn your gift list into a quiet, joyful act of resistance by ensuring more people (especially kids) have access to the full range of books that reflect and expand our world. Below is a practical guide to weaving the freedom to read into your seasonal giving without adding stress (or breaking the budget). Think of it as a menu: pick a few items that fit your time, interest, and resources, and you’ll end the season with gifts that last far beyond December.


How to Talk to Your Kids About Banned Books

mom talking to daughter with a book

It can feel overwhelming, even confusing, when the books we treasure (and the stories we believe every child should have the right to read) make headlines for being challenged or banned. Whether it's a picture book about inclusion, a middle grade novel tackling tough topics like grief or fitting in, or a young adult story centering voices historically pushed to the margins, book bans don’t just remove paper from shelves, they erase entire experiences and diminish our ability to learn from one another.


Florida’s New Social Studies Standards: A Deepening Crisis for Critical Thinking and Honest History

map of florida with tack in it

Florida’s newly proposed K–12 social studies standards are raising alarms among parents, educators, and First Amendment advocates who fear students will be taught a stripped-down and ideologically constrained version of American history. The new emphasis on anti-communism, paired with the decision to keep deeply problematic African American history standards unchanged, signals a classroom environment where questioning, debate, and critical thinking may no longer be welcome.


You Went to the “No Kings” Protest… Now What?

fists in the air

Attending a protest—such as the recent No Kings Protests—is an exciting and powerful first step. You showed up, you raised your voice, you stood for something. But the truth is: the fight for intellectual freedom and the right to read doesn’t end when the signs come down. In fact, for many of us it’s just the beginning.


How to Talk to Your Legislators About the Freedom to Read

woman speaking to law maker

Making the Most of Five Minutes That Could Change the Conversation

Our elected officials expect to receive pop-in visits from constituents whether in their offices at the capitol or back in their home districts. They also make time for quick virtual meetings to appear accessible and connected to the people they represent. These meetings might last only five or ten minutes, and you may not always meet directly with the legislator, but with someone on their staff. That’s okay. Staffers are the gatekeepers, the people who brief their bosses, recommend what deserves attention, and often draft the talking points and legislative memos that shape the law.


What’s Really at Stake: The And Tango Makes Three Ruling and the Slippery Reasoning That Fails Us

cover of and tango makes three

A recent ruling in Escambia County, Florida, struck down a First Amendment challenge to the school board’s removal of And Tango Makes Three, a children’s picture book about two male penguins raising a chick. The decision rested on a deeply concerning premise: that neither authors nor patrons (students) hold First Amendment rights with respect to a library collection. In other words, the court said: you have no constitutional right to expect certain perspectives and ideas to be made available.